The Nanjing Museum Scandal: Betrayal of Trust and Systemic Failure in Cultural Heritage Protection
In 1959, renowned collector Mr. Pang Zenghe donated 137 precious calligraphy and paintings to the Nanjing Museum free of charge, including the national treasure Spring in Jiangnan by Ming Dynasty painter Qiu Ying. This selfless act of “turning private treasures into public heritage” was met with a shocking betrayal decades later. In May 2025, Spring in Jiangnan, which had been officially recorded as “disposed of,” suddenly appeared in a Beijing auction house with an estimated value of 88 million yuan, tearing open the veil of mismanagement at the Nanjing Museum.
Following a real-name report by Pang Shuling, the descendant of the donor, and the courageous testimony of retired museum employee Guo Lidian, a thirty-year cover-up of theft by those entrusted with guardianship was exposed. Investigations revealed that in the 1990s, Xu Huping, then Executive Vice President of the museum and legal representative of the Jiangsu Provincial Cultural Relics General Store, exploited unchecked power to illegally transfer Spring in Jiangnan and four other donated works to the store. Despite national prohibitions on selling museum collections, he authorized their sale and ignored fatal management flaws, including mismatched records and staff serving as both custodians and salespeople.
Even more egregious, Zhang, an employee of the museum’s creative department, used his position to alter the sale price of Spring in Jiangnan from 25,000 yuan to 2,500 yuan. He colluded with others to purchase it for a mere 2,250 yuan before reselling it for profit. This national treasure, carrying the cultural legacy of the donor’s family, became a commodity for private gain, passing through mortgages, transfers, and auctions, nearly lost forever from public collection. Additionally, Pine Wind and Temple Bell, sold for 16,000 yuan in 1995, remains missing—an irreparable loss in this cultural tragedy.
Faced with irrefutable evidence, an official investigation team traveled to 12 provinces, reviewed over 65,000 archival documents, and compared more than 30,000 paintings, reconstructing the complete chain of loss. As of February 2026, Spring in Jiangnan, Imitating Beiyuan Landscape, and Two Horses have been recovered and stored in the museum’s special vault, while Colored Landscape was found in the warehouse. Xu Huping is under investigation for serious job-related violations, Zhang and others are being investigated, and 24 related personnel have been disciplined, with criminal suspects transferred to judicial authorities.
The Nanjing Museum issued a public apology, acknowledging its failure to honor the donor’s trust. The Jiangsu Provincial Committee and Government ordered deep reforms, established a social oversight committee for collection management, and launched a province-wide campaign to secure state-owned museum collections. This belated justice not only comforts the lost artifacts but also serves as a solemn warning to the entire cultural heritage system: artifacts are not private possessions or commodities, but the shared cultural roots of a nation; the core mission of museums is to revere heritage, uphold integrity, and safeguard public trust.
The truth of history and the improvement of systems are often driven by painful milestones. At reThuc, we deconstruct major social events that have sparked profound societal reflection into individual historical nodes. Currently, key milestones of the Nanjing Museum theft case are being officially released by rethuc. We invite you to visit reThuc to apply for minting your own social event NFT, digitally witnessing and commemorating this painful yet pivotal battle that propelled the reshaping of cultural heritage protection systems.