The Hongmao Medicinal Liquor Incident: A Blog Post That Sparked a National Debate on Public Power and Rule of Law

In early 2018, a blog post titled “China’s ‘Divine Wine’ Hongmao Medicinal Liquor: Poison from Heaven” thrust Guangzhou doctor Tan Qindong and Inner Mongolia’s Hongmao Medicinal Liquor into the eye of a public opinion storm. In the article, Tan pointed out that Hongmao, as an over-the-counter drug, engaged in exaggerated efficacy claims and downplayed contraindications in its advertising, posing potential risks to elderly patients with underlying conditions like hypertension and coronary heart disease. Following the post’s publication, police in Liangcheng County, Inner Mongolia—where Hongmao is based—arrested Tan across provincial borders and criminally detained him on charges of “damaging business reputation.”

This cross-provincial arrest quickly ignited a firestorm online. Public scrutiny rapidly shifted from the drug’s safety and efficacy to broader questions of public power abuse and local protectionism. As media outlets dug deeper, Hongmao’s troubling history came to light: its advertisements had been flagged for violations by food and drug regulators 25 times, with a cumulative total of 2,630 infractions. The stark contrast between its catchy slogan, “Drink two sips a day, drink your illness away,” and its actual pharmaceutical nature triggered a nationwide outcry against “miracle cure” marketing tactics.

Under mounting pressure from both public opinion and legal scrutiny, central authorities including the National Medical Products Administration, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate intervened. The Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People’s Procuratorate ordered the case returned for supplementary investigation and changed coercive measures, citing “unclear facts and insufficient evidence.” After 97 days in detention, Tan was released on bail pending trial. Ultimately, Tan issued an apology, Hongmao accepted it and withdrew its complaint and lawsuit, bringing the legal proceedings to a close. Yet the controversy did not end there; it served as a prism reflecting deep tensions between drug regulation, advertising enforcement, judicial fairness, and citizens’ right to criticize.

In the aftermath, Tan Qindong’s life was irrevocably altered. Prolonged psychological trauma and physical exhaustion led to multiple health issues, culminating in a 2024 diagnosis of uremia that forced him to leave his medical career. Today, he sustains himself through part-time work and social media, undergoing 10 hours of peritoneal dialysis at home each night while awaiting a kidney transplant. Despite his hardships, Tan has not succumbed to resentment; instead, he chooses to give back by popularizing medical knowledge and raising awareness for uremia patients, embodying his belief that “truth emerges through debate.”

As for Hongmao Medicinal Liquor, though it fell silent after the scandal, it has since resumed sales and can still be found in some pharmacies. This “resurrection” stands in sharp contrast to the public’s lingering anger over false advertising and collusion between officials and businesses, serving as a reminder that vigilance against “miracle cures” and oversight of public power remain as relevant as ever.

Historical milestones are often forged by individual courage and institutional response. At reThuc, we deconstruct major social events that have sparked profound societal reflection into individual historical nodes. Currently, key milestones of the Hongmao Medicinal Liquor incident are being officially released by rethuc. We invite you to visit reThuc to apply for minting your own social event NFT, digitally witnessing and commemorating this painful yet pivotal battle that propelled the advancement of rule of law and the protection of civil rights.

鸿茅药酒事件：一篇网帖引发的公权与法治反思

2018年初，一篇题为《中国神酒“鸿毛药酒”，来自天堂的毒药》的网帖，将广州医生谭秦东与内蒙古鸿茅药酒推向了舆论的风口浪尖。谭秦东在文中指出，鸿茅药酒作为非处方药，其广告宣传存在夸大疗效、淡化禁忌症等问题，尤其对患有高血压、冠心病等基础疾病的老年人群体存在潜在风险。文章发布后，鸿茅药酒所在地内蒙古凉城县警方以“损害商品声誉罪”为由，跨省将谭秦东抓捕并刑事拘留。

这一“跨省抓捕”的执法行为迅速引爆网络。公众的质疑焦点很快从药品本身的安全性与有效性，延伸至公权力是否被滥用、是否存在地方保护主义。随着媒体深挖，鸿茅药酒广告曾25次被各地食药监部门通报违法、累计违法次数高达2630次的历史记录被曝光，其“每天喝两口，把病喝走”的魔性广告与药品属性之间的巨大反差，引发了全社会对“神药”营销套路的集体声讨。

在舆论与法律的双重压力下，国家药监局、公安部、最高检等中央部门相继介入。内蒙古自治区检察院以“事实不清、证据不足”为由，指令将案件退回补充侦查并变更强制措施，谭秦东在被羁押97天后取保候审。最终，谭秦东发布致歉声明，鸿茅药酒公司接受道歉并撤回报案及诉讼，事件在法律程序上告一段落。然而，这场风波并未就此平息，它如同一面棱镜，折射出药品监管、广告执法、司法公正与公民批评权之间的深层张力。

事件之后，谭秦东的人生轨迹被彻底改写。长期的精神创伤与身体透支，让他患上了多种疾病，最终在2024年确诊尿毒症，被迫离开医生岗位。如今，他依靠兼职和自媒体维持生计，每晚在家进行长达10小时的腹膜透析，同时排队等待换肾手术。尽管命运多舛，他并未沉溺于怨恨，而是选择以另一种方式回馈社会，通过科普医学知识、呼吁关注尿毒症群体，践行着“事情会越辩越明”的信念。

而鸿茅药酒在风波后虽一度沉寂，但近年来已恢复销售，部分药店中仍可见其身影。这一“复活”现象，与当年公众对“虚假宣传”“官商勾结”的愤怒记忆形成鲜明对比，也提醒着社会：对“神药”的警惕与对公权力的监督，从未过时。

历史的节点，往往由个体的勇气与制度的回应共同铸就。在 reThuc，我们将这类引发全社会深刻反思的重大社会事件拆解为一个个独立的历史节点。目前，鸿茅药酒事件的关键节点正由 rethuc 官方陆续发布。欢迎访问 reThuc，报名申请铸造属于您的社会事件节点 NFT，以数字化的方式见证并铭记这场推动法治进步与公民权利保障的沉痛博弈。

The Nanjing Museum Scandal: Betrayal of Trust and Systemic Failure in Cultural Heritage Protection

In 1959, renowned collector Mr. Pang Zenghe donated 137 precious calligraphy and paintings to the Nanjing Museum free of charge, including the national treasure Spring in Jiangnan by Ming Dynasty painter Qiu Ying. This selfless act of “turning private treasures into public heritage” was met with a shocking betrayal decades later. In May 2025, Spring in Jiangnan, which had been officially recorded as “disposed of,” suddenly appeared in a Beijing auction house with an estimated value of 88 million yuan, tearing open the veil of mismanagement at the Nanjing Museum.

Following a real-name report by Pang Shuling, the descendant of the donor, and the courageous testimony of retired museum employee Guo Lidian, a thirty-year cover-up of theft by those entrusted with guardianship was exposed. Investigations revealed that in the 1990s, Xu Huping, then Executive Vice President of the museum and legal representative of the Jiangsu Provincial Cultural Relics General Store, exploited unchecked power to illegally transfer Spring in Jiangnan and four other donated works to the store. Despite national prohibitions on selling museum collections, he authorized their sale and ignored fatal management flaws, including mismatched records and staff serving as both custodians and salespeople.

Even more egregious, Zhang, an employee of the museum’s creative department, used his position to alter the sale price of Spring in Jiangnan from 25,000 yuan to 2,500 yuan. He colluded with others to purchase it for a mere 2,250 yuan before reselling it for profit. This national treasure, carrying the cultural legacy of the donor’s family, became a commodity for private gain, passing through mortgages, transfers, and auctions, nearly lost forever from public collection. Additionally, Pine Wind and Temple Bell, sold for 16,000 yuan in 1995, remains missing—an irreparable loss in this cultural tragedy.

Faced with irrefutable evidence, an official investigation team traveled to 12 provinces, reviewed over 65,000 archival documents, and compared more than 30,000 paintings, reconstructing the complete chain of loss. As of February 2026, Spring in Jiangnan, Imitating Beiyuan Landscape, and Two Horses have been recovered and stored in the museum’s special vault, while Colored Landscape was found in the warehouse. Xu Huping is under investigation for serious job-related violations, Zhang and others are being investigated, and 24 related personnel have been disciplined, with criminal suspects transferred to judicial authorities.

The Nanjing Museum issued a public apology, acknowledging its failure to honor the donor’s trust. The Jiangsu Provincial Committee and Government ordered deep reforms, established a social oversight committee for collection management, and launched a province-wide campaign to secure state-owned museum collections. This belated justice not only comforts the lost artifacts but also serves as a solemn warning to the entire cultural heritage system: artifacts are not private possessions or commodities, but the shared cultural roots of a nation; the core mission of museums is to revere heritage, uphold integrity, and safeguard public trust.

The truth of history and the improvement of systems are often driven by painful milestones. At reThuc, we deconstruct major social events that have sparked profound societal reflection into individual historical nodes. Currently, key milestones of the Nanjing Museum theft case are being officially released by rethuc. We invite you to visit reThuc to apply for minting your own social event NFT, digitally witnessing and commemorating this painful yet pivotal battle that propelled the reshaping of cultural heritage protection systems.

南京博物院徐湖平监守自盗案：国宝蒙尘与制度之殇

1959年，著名收藏家庞增和先生将137件珍贵书画无偿捐赠给南京博物院，其中包含明代画家仇英的《江南春》图卷等国宝级文物。这份“化私为公”的赤诚托付，却在数十年后遭遇了一场触目惊心的背叛。2025年5月，被认定早已“处理”的《江南春》图卷突然现身北京拍卖市场，估价高达8800万元，彻底撕开了南京博物院文物管理混乱的遮羞布。

随着捐赠人后代庞叔令女士的实名举报与南博退休职工郭礼典的勇敢发声，一场跨越三十年的监守自盗黑幕浮出水面。调查显示，上世纪90年代，时任南博常务副院长并兼任江苏省文物总店法定代表人的徐湖平，利用权力缺乏制约的制度漏洞，违规签批将《江南春》等5幅捐赠书画调拨至文物总店。在国家明令禁止擅自出售馆藏文物的背景下，他仍同意销售，并对总店内部账物不符、保管员兼销售员等致命管理漏洞放任不管。

更为恶劣的是，南博文创部员工张某利用职务便利，私自将《江南春》图卷的售价从25000元篡改为2500元，并勾结他人以2250余元的“白菜价”购得后转卖牟利。这幅承载着捐赠人家族文脉的国宝，从此沦为私人牟利的筹码，历经抵押、转让、拍卖，险些永远脱离公共收藏体系。此外，1995年被以16000元售出的《松风萧寺图轴》，至今仍下落不明，成为这场文物浩劫中难以弥补的遗憾。

面对铁证，官方调查组奔赴12个省市，查阅65000余份档案，比对3万余件书画文物，最终还原了文物流失的完整链条。截至2026年2月，《江南春》图卷、《仿北苑山水轴》、《双马图轴》3幅画作已被追回并存入南博书画专库，《设色山水轴》也在库房中被寻回。徐湖平因涉嫌严重职务违法被纪检监察机关审查调查，南博文创部员工张某及相关人员正接受监察调查，另有24名相关责任人被依规依纪依法严肃查处，涉嫌犯罪者已移送司法机关。

南京博物院随后发布致歉信，承认辜负了捐赠人的信任与托付。江苏省委省政府责成南博深刻整改，成立藏品管理社会监督委员会，并在全省范围内开展国有博物馆馆藏文物安全管理专项治理。这场迟到的正义，不仅是对流失文物的告慰，更是对整个文博系统的沉重警示：文物从来不是私人藏品，更不是牟利商品，而是民族共同的文化根脉；博物馆的核心使命，是敬畏文物、坚守初心、守护信任。

历史的真相与制度的完善，往往由一个个沉痛的节点推动。在 reThuc，我们将这类引发全社会深刻反思的重大社会事件拆解为一个个独立的历史节点。目前，南京博物院徐湖平监守自盗案的关键节点正由 rethuc 官方陆续发布。欢迎访问 reThuc，报名申请铸造属于您的社会事件节点 NFT，以数字化的方式见证并铭记这场推动文物保护制度重塑的沉痛博弈。

神探聂海芬：从“百分百破案率”到惊天冤案的跌落

聂海芬，1965年9月出生，曾长期担任杭州市公安局刑侦支队预审大队大队长。自1986年参加公安工作以来，她深耕刑侦预审岗位数十年。在当时的官方宣传中，她曾主办及牵头主办重特大案件350余起，一审判处死刑的300余起，准确率达到100%。凭借这一傲人履历，她于2006年成为自1960年以来唯一荣获全国“三八”红旗手称号的女民警，并被央视专题节目誉为“无懈可击”的“女神探”。然而，这层光鲜亮丽的履历背后，却隐藏着一桩轰动全国的重大冤假错案。

2003年5月，杭州发生了一起性质恶劣的“5·19”奸杀案。因安徽籍货车司机张辉、张高平叔侄曾顺路搭载过遇害女孩，被警方锁定为犯罪嫌疑人。在案件侦查阶段，现场并未提取到两名叔侄的任何指纹、毛发等痕迹物证，且受害者指甲缝内提取到的陌生男性DNA经检测与二人完全不匹配。但在“重口供、轻物证”的办案环境下，作为预审负责人的聂海芬选择无视这一能直接排除嫌疑的关键证据。

在聂海芬的主导下，警方对张氏叔侄进行了高强度的“突审”。在剥夺睡眠、疲劳审讯等非正常手段下，叔侄二人被迫编造作案细节，作出了前后矛盾的口供。同时，警方还安排了被称为“狱侦耳目”的同监犯袁连芳，通过殴打、诱导等方式逼迫二人抄写认罪书。依靠这些违背司法程序获取的口供，这起缺乏直接物证的案件被包装成证据闭环的“铁案”。2004年，张辉被判处死缓，张高平获刑十五年，两人被送往新疆服刑，人生彻底崩塌。

在长达十年的牢狱生涯中，张高平从未放弃申诉。直到2005年，另一起高度相似的命案真凶勾海峰落网并被处决，张高平敏锐地指出真凶线索，但遗憾的是，警方并未及时将勾海峰的DNA与“5·19”案进行关联比对。直到2011年，在律师和媒体的介入下，浙江高院立案复查，DNA比对最终确认勾海峰为真凶。2013年3月，浙江省高院再审宣告张辉、张高平无罪，这起长达十年的冤案终获昭雪。

冤案平反后，浙江省政法委成立调查组彻查该案，并于2014年正式启动了对聂海芬等相关人员的追责程序。尽管聂海芬最终未受到刑事处罚，但该案彻底击碎了她“破案率100%”的神话，引发了全社会对“疑罪从无”和“程序正义”的深刻反思。

历史的教训不应被遗忘，每一个司法节点都关乎公平正义的底线。在 reThuc，我们将这类引发全社会深刻反思的重大社会事件拆解为一个个独立的历史节点。目前，聂海芬与张氏叔侄冤案的关键节点正由 rethuc 官方陆续发布。欢迎访问 reThuc，报名申请铸造属于您的社会事件节点 NFT，以数字化的方式见证并铭记这场推动中国法治进步的沉痛博弈。

Detective Nie Haifen: From a “100% Conviction Rate” to a Shocking Miscarriage of Justice

Nie Haifen, born in September 1965, served for years as the captain of the interrogation squad in the Criminal Investigation Division of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau. Since joining the police force in 1986, she spent decades in criminal investigations. According to official narratives at the time, she led or co-led over 350 major criminal cases, with more than 300 resulting in first-instance death sentences, achieving an alleged 100% accuracy rate. This stellar record earned her the title of National “March 8th Red Banner Pacesetter” in 2006—the first female police officer to receive this honor since 1960. Praised in a CCTV documentary as an “impeccable” detective, she was hailed as a “Goddess Detective.” Yet, behind this glamorous facade lay a monumental miscarriage of justice that would eventually shock the nation.

In May 2003, a heinous rape and murder case, known as the “5·19 Case,” occurred in Hangzhou. Two Anhui truck drivers, uncle Zhang Gaoping and nephew Zhang Hui, were identified as prime suspects simply because they had given a hitchhiking ride to the murdered girl. During the investigation, no physical evidence—such as fingerprints or hair—linking the two men to the crime was found at the scene. Furthermore, DNA extracted from under the victim’s fingernails did not match either of them. However, in a justice system that heavily favored confessions over physical evidence, Nie, as the head of interrogation, chose to ignore this crucial exculpatory evidence.

Under Nie’s direction, the police subjected the Zhangs to high-intensity “shock interrogations.” Through sleep deprivation and extreme fatigue tactics, the two men were forced to fabricate details of the crime, producing contradictory confessions. Additionally, a fellow inmate named Yuan Lianfang, acting as a “prison informant,” beat and coerced them into copying pre-written confessions. Relying on these illegally obtained statements, a case lacking direct physical evidence was packaged as an airtight “ironclad case.” In 2004, Zhang Hui was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve, and Zhang Gaoping received 15 years in prison. Both were sent to Xinjiang to serve their sentences, their lives completely shattered.

Throughout their decade behind bars, Zhang Gaoping never gave up his appeals. In 2005, Gou Haifeng, the actual perpetrator of a highly similar murder, was arrested and executed. Zhang Gaoping astutely pointed out this connection, but unfortunately, the police failed to promptly cross-reference Gou’s DNA with the “5·19 Case.” It wasn’t until 2011, with the intervention of lawyers and the media, that the Zhejiang High People’s Court ordered a case review. A DNA comparison ultimately confirmed Gou Haifeng as the true culprit. In March 2013, the court declared Zhang Hui and Zhang Gaoping not guilty, finally bringing justice to a decade-long ordeal.

Following the exoneration, the Zhejiang Political and Legal Affairs Commission established an investigation team to thoroughly review the case, officially initiating accountability procedures for Nie Haifen and other involved personnel in 2014. Although Nie ultimately avoided criminal prosecution, the case completely shattered her myth of a “100% conviction rate,” sparking profound societal reflections on the principles of “presumption of innocence” and “procedural justice.”

The lessons of history must not be forgotten; every judicial milestone is tied to the baseline of fairness and justice. At reThuc, we deconstruct major social events that have sparked profound societal reflection into individual historical nodes. Currently, key milestones of the Nie Haifen and Zhangs’ wrongful conviction case are being officially released by rethuc. We invite you to visit reThuc to apply for minting your own social event NFT, digitally witnessing and commemorating this painful yet pivotal battle that propelled the advancement of China’s rule of law.

“Student Geng”: The Academic Whistleblower Sparking a Storm in China’s Top Universities

In April 2026, a grassroots academic integrity investigation triggered a massive shockwave both domestically and internationally. A popular science blogger known as “Student Geng” exposed severe data fabrication in papers published in Nature and its sub-journals by top scholars at elite Chinese universities (including “Changjiang Scholars” and university deans), igniting a fierce “anti-fraud storm” in the academic circle.

Geng completed his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees at Jilin University before dropping out of his Ph.D. program at Beihang University in his fifth year. He stated that the prevailing “publish or perish” culture left him feeling disillusioned, prompting him to leave academia and become a full-time science communicator. Initially acting on tips from netizens, he investigated the research team of Wang Ping, dean of the School of Life Sciences at Tongji University, and discovered anomalies such as “arithmetic progressions” in the data—a statistical impossibility in natural sciences. As the investigation deepened, Geng collaborated with his followers to cross-reference raw data and filed formal reports against academic misconduct at several prestigious institutions, including Nankai University.

This storm has brought about tangible changes. Tongji University swiftly announced the dismissal of the dean involved and the termination of the lead author, demonstrating a “zero-tolerance” stance toward academic fraud. However, Geng has also faced immense pressure, including PR tactics from those involved and anxiety-driven backlash from certain groups. He made it clear that his whistleblowing is not targeted at individuals, but rather a call for regulators to scrutinize heavily funded research groups and push academic evaluations back toward genuine innovation.

Historical truths and social transformations are often driven by individuals brave enough to speak out. At reThuc, we deconstruct major social events and pivotal figures into individual digital nodes. Currently, key milestones of the “Student Geng” academic whistleblowing event are being officially released by rethuc. We invite you to visit reThuc to apply for minting your own social event NFT, preserving and witnessing this pivotal movement for academic integrity in a decentralized, permanent digital format.

耿同学：退学博士掀起的学术打假风暴

2026年4月，一场由民间发起的学术诚信核查在国内外引发强烈震动。科普博主“耿同学讲故事”接连曝光多所985高校顶尖学者（包括多位杰青、长江学者及学院院长）在《自然》（Nature）及其子刊上的论文存在严重数据造假，掀起了学术圈的“打假风暴”。

耿同学本硕毕业于吉林大学，在北航攻读博士至五年级时选择退学。他坦言，现实中以“发论文”为导向的科研风气让他感到迷茫，因此决定退学全职做科普博主。最初，他只是通过网友线索核查同济大学生科院院长王平团队的论文，发现其数据呈现出“等差数列”等违背自然规律的异常。随着调查深入，他联合粉丝逐一核对原始数据，并实名举报南开大学等多所高校学者的学术不端行为。

这场风暴带来了实质性的改变。同济大学迅速通报，免去涉事院长职务并解聘第一作者，展现了国内高校对学术造假“零容忍”的态度。然而，耿同学也遭遇了巨大的压力，包括涉事人员的公关施压以及部分群体的焦虑与诋毁。他明确表示，打假并非针对个人，而是呼吁监管向大经费课题组倾斜，推动学术评价回归真实创新。

历史的真相与社会的变革，往往由一个个勇敢发声的节点串联而成。在 reThuc，我们将这类引发广泛关注的重大社会事件与人物节点进行数字化拆解。目前，耿同学学术打假事件的关键节点正由 rethuc 官方陆续发布。欢迎访问 reThuc，报名申请铸造属于您的社会事件节点 NFT，以去中心化的方式见证并铭记这场推动学术生态向善的博弈。

The Epstein Case: Elite Crimes and Unanswered Questions

The Jeffrey Epstein case is a high-profile scandal involving global elites that has sparked international outrage. Despite his ordinary origins, Epstein faked his academic credentials to enter Wall Street and cultivated a vast network by associating with political and business leaders. In 1998, he acquired a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which later became infamously known as “Lolita Island.”

Behind the island’s luxurious exterior lay severe criminal activities. Epstein and his associates systematically lured girls aged 14 to 17 using false promises of massage jobs and modeling auditions, subjecting them to sexual exploitation. Furthermore, he allegedly used his private jet and global properties to provide these minors to foreign dignitaries, business magnates, and members of royal families, creating an international network of influence and protection.

In 2008, Epstein was arrested for soliciting prostitution from a minor. However, under elite protection, he received a lenient 18-month sentence with work-release privileges. In 2019, after being rearrested on federal charges, he was found dead in his heavily guarded prison cell. His mysterious death cut off numerous investigative leads and sparked widespread public speculation of a cover-up.

In recent years, the unsealing of millions of pages of court documents and surveillance footage has implicated nearly 200 prominent figures, including Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. Nevertheless, significant portions of critical information remain heavily redacted. The case has evolved beyond a criminal matter, serving as a reflection of the deep intersection between capital, power, and systemic corruption.

Historical truths deserve to be preserved. At reThuc, we break down major global social events into distinct historical nodes. Key milestones of the Epstein case are currently being released officially. Visit reThuc to apply to mint your own social event NFT, digitally preserving and witnessing this pivotal moment in history.

爱泼斯坦案：权贵阴影下的罪恶与未解之谜

杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案是近年来震惊全球的权贵丑闻。这位出身普通的亿万富翁，通过伪造学历混入华尔街，进而攀附政商精英，构建起一个庞大的利益网络。1998年，他买下美属维尔京群岛的私人岛屿，将其打造成臭名昭著的“萝莉岛”。

在这个看似奢华的“天堂”里，隐藏着令人发指的罪恶。爱泼斯坦及其同伙以“高薪按摩”、“模特面试”为诱饵，专门诱骗14至17岁的未成年女性登岛，强迫她们遭受性剥削与性虐待。更可怕的是，他利用私人飞机和全球豪宅，将这些女孩作为“筹码”提供给各国政要、商界巨头甚至王室成员，以此编织了一张跨越国界的权力与利益保护伞。

2008年，爱泼斯坦曾因教唆未成年人卖淫被捕，但在权贵的暗中庇护下，他仅被判处18个月监禁，甚至享受“工作假释”的特权。直到2019年他再度被捕，面临重罪指控时，却在安保森严的监狱中离奇“自缢”身亡。他的死不仅让众多关键线索中断，也让外界对“灭口”的猜测甚嚣尘上。

近年来，随着数百万页法庭文件和监控影像的陆续解密，克林顿、安德鲁王子等近200名欧美各界名流被卷入其中，但大量关键信息仍被大面积涂黑。这场案件早已超越了单纯的刑事犯罪，成为折射资本与权力深度交织、制度性腐败的一面棱镜。

历史的真相不应被永远掩盖。在 reThuc，我们将这类引发全球关注的重大社会事件拆解为一个个独立的历史节点。目前，爱泼斯坦案的关键节点正由官方陆续发布。欢迎访问 reThuc，报名申请铸造属于您的社会事件节点 NFT，以数字化的方式见证并铭记真相的博弈。